Whole Slide Imaging Versus Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology

نویسندگان

  • Sanjay Mukhopadhyay
  • Michael D. Feldman
  • Esther Abels
  • Raheela Ashfaq
  • Senda Beltaifa
  • Nicolas G. Cacciabeve
  • Helen P. Cathro
  • Liang Cheng
  • Kumarasen Cooper
  • Glenn E. Dickey
  • Ryan M. Gill
  • Robert P. Heaton
  • René Kerstens
  • Guy M. Lindberg
  • Reenu K. Malhotra
  • James W. Mandell
  • Ellen D. Manlucu
  • Anne M. Mills
  • Stacey E. Mills
  • Christopher A. Moskaluk
  • Mischa Nelis
  • Deepa T. Patil
  • Christopher G. Przybycin
  • Jordan P. Reynolds
  • Brian P. Rubin
  • Mohammad H. Saboorian
  • Mauricio Salicru
  • Mark A. Samols
  • Charles D. Sturgis
  • Kevin O. Turner
  • Mark R. Wick
  • Ji Y. Yoon
  • Po Zhao
  • Clive R. Taylor
چکیده

Most prior studies of primary diagnosis in surgical pathology using whole slide imaging (WSI) versus microscopy have focused on specific organ systems or included relatively few cases. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that WSI is noninferior to microscopy for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology. A blinded randomized noninferiority study was conducted across the entire range of surgical pathology cases (biopsies and resections, including hematoxylin and eosin, immunohistochemistry, and special stains) from 4 institutions using the original sign-out diagnosis (baseline diagnosis) as the reference standard. Cases were scanned, converted to WSI and randomized. Sixteen pathologists interpreted cases by microscopy or WSI, followed by a wash-out period of ≥4 weeks, after which cases were read by the same observers using the other modality. Major discordances were identified by an adjudication panel, and the differences between major discordance rates for both microscopy (against the reference standard) and WSI (against the reference standard) were calculated. A total of 1992 cases were included, resulting in 15,925 reads. The major discordance rate with the reference standard diagnosis was 4.9% for WSI and 4.6% for microscopy. The difference between major discordance rates for microscopy and WSI was 0.4% (95% confidence interval, -0.30% to 1.01%). The difference in major discordance rates for WSI and microscopy was highest in endocrine pathology (1.8%), neoplastic kidney pathology (1.5%), urinary bladder pathology (1.3%), and gynecologic pathology (1.2%). Detailed analysis of these cases revealed no instances where interpretation by WSI was consistently inaccurate compared with microscopy for multiple observers. We conclude that WSI is noninferior to microscopy for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology, including biopsies and resections stained with hematoxylin and eosin, immunohistochemistry and special stains. This conclusion is valid across a wide variety of organ systems and specimen types.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Critical comparison of 31 commercially available digital slide systems in pathology.

Advances in new technologies for complete slide digitization in pathology have allowed the appearance of a wide spectrum of technologic solutions for whole-slide scanning, which have been classified into motorized microscopes and scanners. This article describes technical aspects of 31 different digital microscopy systems. The most relevant characteristics of the scanning devices are described,...

متن کامل

Clinical Applications of Whole-slide Imaging in Anatomic Pathology.

The development of whole-slide imaging has paved the way for digitizing of glass slides that are the basis for surgical pathology. This transformative technology has changed the landscape in research applications and education but despite its tremendous potential, its adoption for clinical use has been slow. We review the various niche applications that initiated awareness of this technology, p...

متن کامل

Use of whole slide imaging in surgical pathology quality assurance: design and pilot validation studies.

By imaging large numbers of slides automatically at high resolution, modem automated whole slide imaging (WSI) systems have the potential to become useful tools in pathology practice. This article describes a pilot validation study for use of automated high-speed WSI systems for surgical pathology quality assurance (QA). This was a retrospective comparative study in which 24 full genitourinary ...

متن کامل

Implementation of whole slide imaging in surgical pathology: A value added approach

BACKGROUND Whole slide imaging (WSI) makes it possible to capture images of an entire histological slide. WSI has established roles in surgical pathology, including support of off-site frozen section interpretation, primary diagnosis, educational activities, and laboratory quality assurance (QA) activities. Analyses of the cost of WSI have traditionally been based solely on direct costs and dia...

متن کامل

Validation of Whole Slide Imaging in Pathology

Validation of whole slide imaging (WSI) is an important process for clinical practice. From a vendor perspective, validation seeks to achieve premarket approval from a regulatory agency in order for them to sell their WSI devices for an intended use (e.g., primary diagnosis). Academic validations are different, as these research studies typically result in publications reporting results of a se...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 42  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2018